What Can I Do To Avoid and Stop Government Mandated Swine Flu Vaccine - Part VI
by Dr. Robert O. Young
Other virus experts are aware that this Swine Flu is a laboratory-generated virus. This current swine flu is at best between 4-8% a match in terms of genetic material to its closest genetic relatives and there is no remotely close match in the public NIH databases. This implies that between 92-96% of the viral genetic code is from spliced laboratory genetic material from previous swine, avian, and 1918 human flu viruses. Aware of these insider facts, a significant number of virologists and other health professionals and scientists stated that this had to be produced in a laboratory and could not occur naturally. This includes Adrian Gibbs, the inventor of Tamiflu who has gone on record stating that the very metrics (nucleic acid ratios) as well as genetic history indicates that this virus is passed through eggs, i.e.: it was created in a laboratory situation. Other whistle blowers include world famous virologist, author, and masters in public health, Dr. Leonard Horowitz who has actually identified the highly probable laboratory location and the highly likely scientists who created it. Former NIH employee Alexander S. Jones has done a genetic analysis using data from Andrew Rambaut at the University of Edinberg, which indicates that this virus is mutating approximately 2.3 times faster than any natural swine or avian flu virus has ever done. Although we do not have 100% evidence, for obvious reasons, the overwhelming proof is that this was a laboratory created virus. It is important to note that once a virus undergoes a significant mutation, the vaccine that was made for it is no longer designed for the mutated virus, assuming any clinical effect from the vaccine.
5. The United States government classifies the bird flu virus as a biological weapon.
According to the United States government, in its own export regulations, the bird flu virus has been classified as a biological weapon. Given the evidence, this so called swine flu is a bioengineered virus and therefore a component of a biological weapons system as defined by Section 175(a) of the BWATA (Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989). It is designed like the "bird flu" to "deliver toxins and microorganisms so to deliberately inflict disease and death on people, while being disguised as injections for prophylactic, protective, or other peaceful purposes." In other words, by their own definition the US accurately views live virus vaccines as potential tools for biological warfare, and in this context, restricts the export of untested, untried, and potentially lethal "experimental vaccines" as biological weapons to rogue nations. The obvious question is why would we attempt to force the same untested and untried potentially lethal live vaccine onto American citizens and particularly our children?
6. If the government intent is to make the live virus squalene adjuvant swine flu vaccination mandatory for all Americans, it is a violation of the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States.
The push behind mandatory vaccinations for the live virus swine flu has reached the highest level in our nation. Although this plan did not start with President Obama, for whatever good or bad intentions, he announced to the public that every man, woman and child should receive the vaccine this fall along with seasonal flu shots. For the record, Obama said he believes vaccinations should be mandatory. Upping this pressure to recklessly vaccinate with an untested live virus vaccine is at best irresponsible as even the statistical scientific evaluation of the effectiveness of flu vaccines suggests all flu vaccinations have had negligible success up until this time. In a scientific review of the data titled: Are US Flu Death Figures More PR Than Science?, it says: "CDC states that the historic 1968-9 "Hong Kong Flu" pandemic killed 34,000 Americans. At the same time, the CDC claims 36,000 Americans annually die from flu." As of August 2009, the swine flu has killed approximately 1,000 people worldwide, according to CNN, which is a lot less than 36,000. This is hardly a traditionally defined pandemic in terms of numbers, yet there has been a major media fear/panic, which preps the people to take this untested and potentially lethal flu vaccine without even a freedom of choice. An uninformed public without adequate compensation for damages, loss of property, life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness required under the US Constitution, is not really acting with choice.
The U.S. Constitutional Amendment I states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." Amendment IV secures the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures; Amendment V states that "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" and Amendment VIII states, "cruel and unusual punishment shall not be inflicted." In context of the U.S. Constitution, the health and natural immunological adequacy of the human body represents private property and is not to be taken or compromised for "public use, without just compensation."
At this point live virus flu vaccinations are seen to be mandatory for children and most likely will become mandatory for all Americans with refusal possibly resulting in being put in internment camps. Federal health officials are starting to recommend that most Americans get three flu shots this fall: one regular flu shot and two doses of the live vaccine made against the new swine flu strain. School children who have never had a flu shot are targeted for four shots in the fall--twice for seasonal flu, twice for pandemic swine flu. (July 15, 2009 news). This unprecedented Department of Health's 2009 flu response plan calls for people--especially children--to receive three or four different live flu virus vaccines simultaneously, which is especially dangerous considering the combining of laboratory-engineered live flu viruses in these vaccines with other viruses resident in the human body (such as seasonal influenza) have the potential be lethal, undermine natural immunity, and/or produce more auto-immune and other diseases in people locally and globally.
The question when considering any medical treatment is what are the risks versus the benefits? We need to look at potential benefits to this or any other flu vaccine to make a reasonable risk benefit analysis. It is already clear the risks are too high...are they balanced, or a secondary concern as compared to the benefits?
7. Analysis from the British Medical Journal article titled, Influenza Vaccination: Policy Versus Evidence, presents evidence from a systematic review based on a meta-analysis of all the research that shows inactivated vaccines have little or no effect on preventing or minimizing the flu.
The science by our own CDC (Center of Disease Control) shows that flu vaccines are somewhere between 0-14% effective. Research in Israel shows they are 1% effective with a general lowering of the immune system. In general, the most thorough analysis on all the flu vaccine data was reported in the British Medical Journal article entitled Influenza Vaccination: Policy Versus Evidence, which gives evidence from a systematic review based on a metaanalysis of all the research showing that, "inactivated vaccines have little or no effect on the effects measured." The paper states most studies are of poor methodological quality and little comparative evidence exists on the safety of these vaccines. It shows that in children under 2 years, inactivated vaccines had the same field efficacy as placebo. Similar results were found in an article from The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2 (2008), titled, Vaccines for Preventing Influenza in Healthy Children where review of 51 studies involving more than 294,000 children, found there was "no evidence that injecting children 6-24 months of age with a flu shot was any more effective than placebo." In children over 2 yrs, it was effective 33% of the time in preventing the flu.
In a study of 800 children with asthma, half were vaccinated and the other half did not receive the influenza vaccine. The two groups were compared with respect to clinic visits, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations for asthma. This study failed to provide evidence that the influenza vaccine prevents pediatric asthma exacerbations. (Effectiveness of influenza vaccine for the prevention of asthma exacerbations. Christly, C. et al. Arch Dis Child. 2004 Aug; 89(8): 734-5). The American Thoracic Society's 105th International Conference, May 15-20, 2009, San Diego quotes: "The inactivated flu vaccine does not prevent influenza-related hospitalizations in children, especially the ones with asthma...In fact, children who get the flu vaccine are three times more at risk for hospitalization than children who do not get the vaccine."
For the rest of this message select: Part VII - What Can I Do To Avoid and Stop Government Mandated Swine Flu Vaccine